Skip to main content
Investment Outlook

Portfolio Pivot: From Bonds to Tangibles

Rethinking the traditional 60/40 portfolio

© 2025 Sarmaya Partners, LLC

July 22, 2025

Wasif Latif
President & Chief
Investment Officer

Shining Through Uncertainty

Bottom Line Upfront: Gold’s resurgence will be a key investment in the Geopolitical & Fiscal Risk sub-theme of the renewed Return to Tangibles commodity cycle.

Key points

  • The 40-year secular bond bull market ended in 2022. In a mirror opposite to the 1980s, today’s investors will not realize this until a new era of rising yields has already begun.
  • Resurgent inflation and growing deficits have ushered in an era of fiscal dominance, disrupting bonds’ traditional role as a safe haven, while the term premium remains elevated.
  • U.S. fiscal health is on thin ice as structural spending and debt levels are pushing the U.S. toward unsustainable territory.
  • As central banks shift their focus to gold, bond markets lose their major price- insensitive buyers. This leaves mostly price-sensitive investors, making bond prices more volatile. Portfolios must evolve in this new inflationary regime. Investors should recalibrate their portfolio allocation by increasing gold and tangible assets like commodities for diversification and defense.

We believe a major secular shift is underway in financial markets as seen in global interest rates, inflation levels, and currency prices. This change is driven by strained sovereign debt levels, escalating geopolitical risks, and a subtle but gradual shift in the relationship between business and government.

What has worked since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) might not work in this new emerging era. The demand for real returns, currency diversification and safety will lead to increasing demand for tangible assets such as gold and broader commodities.

The 40-year bond bull market ended in 2022

Wasif Latif
President & Chief
Investment Officer

Source: Bloomberg, Sarmaya Partners; As of 6/30/2025

Background

As exciting as the stock market is to watch for many, the bigger story is unfolding in the bond market. Bonds have been thought of as this boring space where investors clip their coupons and benefit from their stability in times of market volatility.

However, the relationship of bonds being the ballast in a diversified portfolio is shifting due to a new inflationary regime of rising government debts and deficits driving interest rates higher.

Fiscal risk trends are deteriorating

The U.S. led the world in launching fiscal spending bazookas during the pandemic to support the private sector. This spending was at war-like levels and was possible by increasing the government’s budget deficit – ushering in the era of fiscal dominance, where government borrowing begins to drive the economy, crowd out the private sector, and makes monetary policy less potent. This fiscal dominance will gradually, but assuredly, push interest rates higher as borrowing levels increase and treasury buyers become leery. The world has awakened to the unsustainable nature of U.S. budget expenditures – most of which are non-discretionary such as Social Security, defense, Medicare and Medicaid.

It’s not a crisis yet – but we need to start focusing on the debt balance before it becomes a crisis. The U.S. is at the point where you realize that your credit card balance has become too big to keep spending at the current rate.

With interest rates well above the near-zero lows last seen in 2021 and higher projected deficits, there is an increasing amount of U.S. debt that needs to be rolled over at a higher interest rate. That is an unsustainable mix.

U.S. Dollar direction impacts commodities. A cyclical dollar bear market does not mean an end to its reserve status. Since the 1960s there have been three cyclical dollar bear markets.

Short-term reprieve masking long-term risks

Inflation has been edging down; however, our view is that this decline is before the impact of tariff price increases and stubborn energy prices shows up in the data. Furthermore, while recession fears may push short-term rates lower, we believe that long-term rates may not come down as much proportionately due to concerns of the high deficits. The U.S. is looking at long-term secular rising interest rates. Something needs to give – such as a “Liz Truss” moment where bond yields jump on too much debt needing to be issued.

Possible policy fixes

History and math show that there are few unappealing choices facing policy makers. We all live in a world of choices that are bound by constraints.

Some of us may recall from our Macro Econ 101 class on how policy makers can address high government debt and deficits using 4 options:

  • defaulting,
  • initiating austerity,
  • grow the economy faster than the rate of debt growth, or
  • decrease the real value of the debt through inflation/monetization.

While option 1, defaulting, is an extremely unlikely scenario, we feel that the more likely scenario is a combination of the remaining three options. While austerity is a low probability outcome at this stage, the chances of a mix of spending cuts and tax increases could rise if there is a tipping point or a bond market revolt such as a “Liz Truss” moment.

In viewing the U.S. levels of Inflation and Economic Growth as a quadrant, we believe we are in the top half of the Inflation and Economic Growth quadrant, but our Boom vs. Bust Economic Growth status will be dependent upon forthcoming productivity growth incentives.

The heavier emphasis will likely be on inflating our way out of the debt burden while trying to create incentives for productivity boosts. AI has the potential for pushing productivity higher and helping us grow out of the debt – akin to an individual increasing their income higher so that the debt level becomes manageable. But just as in our personal lives, it is easier said than done.

Factoring in these scenarios, we’re likely looking at benefit cuts, higher taxes, and higher inflation over the next several years as the U.S. addresses these unsustainable imbalances.

Possible policy response scenarios to high debt

Facing reluctant buying of long bonds, the Treasury department will be forced to restart issuing short-term bills to meet the funding needs – a new set of buyers seems to be lining up through the increasing footprint of Stablecoin issuers alongside the existing money market funds.

If there is a wider economic air-pocket, then the Fed will likely step back in and restart QE (Quantitative Easing) as well as requiring banks to hold more treasuries on their balance sheets.

Large-scale issuance of short-term debt, politicizing the central bank and QE resembles policies often seen in emerging markets, which can weaken the currency and fuel inflation.

Market impacts

“The bond market is the mirror opposite of the 1980s”

~ Stanley Druckenmiller

So, what does all this macro stuff mean for financial markets and portfolios?

We believe that the 40-year bond bull market ended in 2022 and that bonds, especially long bonds, are in a secular bear market that will unfold over the next several years. The path might not be too dissimilar to the 1970s.

As illustrated in the quadrant above, an inflationary and weakening environment benefits commodities, especially gold. A portfolio allocated to tangible assets that cannot be inflated or debased away, such as gold, gold mining companies and broader commodities, can benefit from the potential risks of bonds and long-duration stocks.

This view is the foundational factor driving our Return to Tangibles secular theme and strategy. We believe the market will come to our position and tangible sectors and assets will lead the next secular theme.

Gold prices since 1964

Commodities are at a historical bottom relative to the S&P 500

Source: Macrobond; NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research), S&P Global; As of 6/30/2025

Bottom line

The classic 60/40 portfolio may no longer offer the protection it once did. With rising inflation, growing deficits, and less demand for government debt, bonds are losing their reliability.

In today’s environment, real assets like gold and broad commodities may offer better diversification and inflation protection as economic and policy pressures build.

Disclosures

The content herein is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content presented herein should not be considered investment advice, the basis for investment decisions, or a source of legal, tax, or accounting guidance. Investment markets inherently carry risks, and investment outcomes may deviate from initial investments. This does not constitute an offer to sell or solicit the purchase of units or shares in any product.

Statements about companies, securities, or other financial information represent personal beliefs and viewpoints of Sarmaya Partners or the respective third party. They do not constitute endorsements or investment recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Some statements herein may express future expectations and forward-looking views based on Sarmaya Partners’ current assumptions. These statements may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, potentially leading to different results than those implied or expressed. All content is subject to change without notice.

Wasif Latif

Author Wasif Latif

More posts by Wasif Latif

Sarmaya Thematic ETF

You are now being redirected to the Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS) website.